The day before yesterday morning, Shanghai No. 2 Intermediate People's Court adjudicated a number of cases involving intellectual property infringement. In a case of adidas trademark infringement, Adidas won. In another case, a sellers selling fake Taobao sellers were prosecuted for "redress" and the result was defeated. At the end of last year, Bai Lu Chi company commissioned the public sales of a number of women's sports shoes. Adidas company that these products infringe their intellectual property, then commissioned by the notary office to buy two pairs of shoes and issued a notary certificate. Since then, the company will be hundred Luochi company and public companies reported to the city two Intermediate People's Court, requesting the cessation of infringement, compensation for losses and the newspaper to eliminate the impact. Second Intermediate People's Court held that the indications of sports shoes on both sides of the upper inclined three bars signs, and Adidas trademark basically no difference. The company uses the same trademark on the same product without the permission of Adidas, which constitutes an infringement. As a sporting goods manager, Zhonglian Company has not paid any attention to its obligations on the goods it sold and has made obvious mistakes. It also constitutes infringement. Second Intermediate Court then decided to support the plaintiffs. Since April 2007, Zhu Jingjing, the owner of "Li Jia Xiaobian" Taobao, has openly sold such world famous brand bags and wallets as "LV", "GUCCI", "CHANEL" and "DIOR" with sales amount over 200,000 yuan. In March this year, 593 pieces of fake brand-name luggage products were seized by public security organs in Zhu Jingjing's room rented. Since then, Zhu was sentenced to 10 years' imprisonment for selling counterfeit registered trademarks of goods and fined 5,000 yuan to confiscate counterfeit goods. After the verdict of the first instance, Zhu Jingjing believed he had the meritorious service of prosecuting and exposing the crime and appealed to the Second Intermediate People's Court of Shanghai for a lighter punishment. After examining the Second Intermediate Court, Zhu Jingjing did not hold the ground for appeal and dismissed the appeal and upheld the original verdict.